Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Julia Stamatova vs Lisa Zaar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - 07-05-24
By Wojtek Kolan - July 5, 2024
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stamatova vs Zaar analysis and find out who is favored!
Stamatova VS Zaar PREDICTION Clay
W15 Kursumlijska Banja wta
05 Jul 2024 / Quarterfinals
Stamatova Vs Zaar Match Overview - When Will They Play?
Julia Stamatova takes on Lisa Zaar in the wta W15 Kursumlijska Banja Women's Singles 2024 on July 5, 2024. Our Expert betting tips are based on over 200,000 past match simulations. When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Stamatova Vs Zaar is now available here.
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Julia Stamatova vs Lisa Zaar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Stamatova 0 - 0 Zaar
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stamatova has won 42.98% of points on their second serve, while Zaar has won 47.52%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stamatova, in recent form, has won 53.88% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zaar has won 63.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.25% and 45.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stamatova has saved 53.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zaar has saved 51.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stamatova has won 52.17% of matches played (W/L 36/ 33), with Zaar winning 54.55% (W/L 18/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stamatova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 139/ 114), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Zaar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 27/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 21/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Stamatova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.78% of matches (W/L 20/ 21), where as Zaar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.68% of matches (W/L 14/ 5). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stamatova has played against opponents with an average rank of 96.03 while Zaar has played against players with an average rank of 171.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stamatova has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zaar has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player formance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below. Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stamatova has converted 48.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zaar has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
747
Rank
451
High
31
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
700
Rank
498
High
24
Age
Plays
Form
53% (470-413)
Career Total W/L
56% (54-43)
47% (14-16)
YTD W/L
60% (6-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Current Event Stats To Check Player Form & Enhance Prediction Accuracy
W15 Kursumlijska Banja
Clay| stats | Julia Stamatova | Lisa Zaar |
|---|---|---|
| Total Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Last Match | 1:33:00 | 1:59:00 |
| Total Time | 2:56:00 | 1:59:00 |
| Aces Pg | 0.11 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs Per Game | 0.57 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 57 | 3 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (405/677) | 63% (40/63) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (243/405) | 65% (26/40) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (135/272) | 57% (13/23) |
| Total BPs Won% | 57% (53/93) | 38% (5/13) |
| Total BPs Saved | 60% (9/15) | 50% (2/4) |
| Service Hold (%) | 63% (10/16) | 80% (8/10) |
| Opp Hold (%) | 13% (2/16) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Pts W% | 51% (347/686) | 48% (38/79) |
| Total Pts Won | 53% (725/1363) | 54% (77/142) |
| Tiebreak W% | 50% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Per Match | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Stamatova Vs Zaar Prediction: Who Wins?
TennisTipster88 : After in-depth analysis of past career performance, current form, and the head-to-head matches of Julia Stamatova and Lisa Zaar, we give Stamatova a 13.69% chance of winning and Zaar 86.31% chance of victory. Our prediction: Zaar wins. If you want to bet on this match it's very important you take the best odds available into consideration as it is the odds value relative to the probability of the outcome that is important. Check out our today's tennis predictions page for full value bet analysis of this and all WTA, ATP and ITF tennis matches!
The Best Odds For Julia Stamatova vs Lisa Zaar For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Stamatova VS Zaar
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Julia Stamatova | Lisa Zaar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (12/13) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (30/29) | 60% (3/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (260/272) | 55% (26/21) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 20 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.52 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 136 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 30.68 | 287 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (935/1517) | 71% (109/154) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (549/935) | 54% (59/109) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (243/582) | 53% (24/45) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (92/189) | 50% (11/22) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (712/1534) | 48% (76/157) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (12/25) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (13/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Julia Stamatova Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Julia Stamatova
Player
Iva Rafailovic
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
25 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Vilma Krebs Hyllested
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Julia Stamatova
46%
(
38 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
34 of
47)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
26 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
30 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Anastasiya Zaparyniuk
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
60 of
80)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
44 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Tara Mihaljevic
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
27 of
36)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Alessia Popescu
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
28 of
40)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petra Konjikusic
Player
Julia Stamatova
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Kaat Coppez
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
8
46%
(
26 of
56)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
46 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
53 of
98)
99
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anja Stankovic
Player
Julia Stamatova
50%
(
28 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
8
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Stamatova
Player
Evgeniya Burdina
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
26 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
58
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
view more
Lisa Zaar Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Dunja Maric
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alice Tubello
Player
Lisa Zaar
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
69 of
91)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
49%
(
38 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Lisa Zaar
75%
(
84 of
112)
1st Serve %
78%
(
78 of
100)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
48%
(
54 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
51 of
100)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Klara Kosan
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
18 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gabriella Broadfoot
Player
Lisa Zaar
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Chloe Noel
68%
(
90 of
132)
1st Serve %
63%
(
88 of
140)
0
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
6
57%
(
51 of
90)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
51 of
88)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
44%
(
58 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
68 of
140)
142
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Lily Fairclough
81%
(
55 of
68)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Julieta Pareja
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
47%
(
36 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-1 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lisa Zaar
Player
Giorgia Roselli
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
24
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Liv Hovde
Player
Lisa Zaar
56%
(
45 of
80)
1st Serve %
71%
(
65 of
91)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
7
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
37 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stamatova Vs Zaar Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Stamatova are available here and Zaar photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Julia Stamatova
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Lisa Zaar
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
